The Student Learning and Development competency area addresses the concepts and principles of student development and learning theory. Thisincludes the ability to apply theory to improve and inform student affairs and teaching practice.
Learning
Student Development Theory was one of the major goals I identified when I
applied to enter this program. Student Development Theory was mentioned in job descriptions I had read
for academic advisor positions for which I applied. Fortunately, it appears my
program is particularly strong in this area. In order to complete my courses in
Student Development Theory and Foundations of Academic Advising, I was required
to articulate all of the items in both Foundational and Intermediate mastery of
the Understanding Theory section of the ACPA-NASPA competency rubric. As the
intermediate items were parts of my writing assignments in these classes, I
believe I have achieved Intermediate mastery of Understanding Theory. I have
already begun to apply this knowledge in my internship. The most important
aspect of Student Development Theory is that it helps us to understand college
students’ needs. Without understanding their needs, we as student affairs
educators would not be able to meet them where they are developmentally. In my
internship, I have found that the most important skill is showing students that
we hear them and we can help them meet— and surmount— their challenges.
Similar to my experiences in my
theory-based courses, my course in Assessment and Evaluation prepared me to
meet many of the Foundational items in the Design and Application and
Assessment and Integration sections of the rubric. In this class, I constructed
my own learning outcomes for my practicum experience. I also learned how to
describe an assessment process, understand the assessment cycle, and assess
both programs with their associated learning outcomes. The only Foundational
item I have not yet mastered is designing programs, however, I furthered my
learning in this area by designing a program in my internship at the University
of Massachusetts – Boston (UMB). As part of our course in Planning and
Administration of Student Affairs, my partner and I designed a program to match
the student development theory we created. Our program is designed to address
the conflicts students experience when they feel that the expectations of their
career and major choices do not align with their personal interests and gifts. Upon
completing our theoretical program, we were able to articulate the benefits of
a cohort model for programs, of mentoring, and of dedicated resources for use
by students who most need them. Yet this program is only theoretical. It is
also very large and requires a budget of its own. The program implemented at
UMB is smaller in scale and has very narrow learning outcomes. Actually
implementing a real program can be a very different thing from merely designing
one. With more practice in program design and implementation, I believe I will
achieve Foundational mastery of the areas of Design and Application and
Assessment and Integration.
In order to reach Intermediate
mastery in these two areas, I will need to be employed in a student affairs
position. Writing and evaluating learning outcomes requires being part of a
division working to achieve a common purpose. Teaching others, creating syllabi
and lesson plans, developing curriculum, and other teaching activities will
only be possible if I am hired for a position that allows me to teach a
first-year seminar course. I would really like to do this, as my colleagues who
teach them say that this is a very rewarding part of their jobs. Teaching a
course can be a way in which to build relationships outside advising sessions,
and those relationships appear to make it easier for students to seek the
resources they need. All students need to be seen and valued within the context
of campus and family/ fictive kin relationships. As Elliott et al (2004) point out, human beings need to know
that we are valued as ends in ourselves and not for someone else’s instrumental
purpose. Institutions of higher education must take their message to heart.
Yes, mattering to others in one’s community affects retention and academic
success. But more than that, mattering makes a qualitative difference in every
college student’s experience. By committing to being fully present with each student,
making them feel seen, heard, and valued, I can do my small part promote their flourishing.